Date: 14th July 2017 at 8:50am
Written by:

Gylfi Sigurdsson has clear and undoubted ability. It’s also unquestionable that Everton hold a strong interest in Swansea’s midfielder given the approaches made for him.

However, the general opinion from those who voted in the most recent poll is that Everton should look to bring him to Goodison Park but should NOT pay the £50m Swansea are looking for.

What did the poll ask?
Should Everton sign Sigurdsson?

How you voted
We should, but NOT at £50m 59%
No, he’s not needed. Especially at £50m 22%
Yes, has the quality we’d want 19%

I’ll stand by my previous views Swansea, quite rightly, are entitled to ask what they think is a fair amount for a player, especially if they’re under contract – a long-term one at that.

But Everton, who I would expect to hold out for a valuation the Blues had of a player, shouldn’t pay over the odds. As good as Sigurdsson is I’d think the most recent rejected bid, reportedly £40m, should be the absolute maximum the Toffees ought to be offering for the Icelandic international.

Thanks but no thanks would be my thinking now.

Swansea boss Paul Clement wants to keep him but has admitted the ‘business side to football’ could mean the Swans have no option but to sell and couldn’t guarantee he’ll remain at the Liberty Stadium this summer.

Meanwhile, a player we’re still far from certain will remain an Everton player is Ross Barkley.

He missed the Tanzania tour due to ‘injury’ but continues to be linked with an exit from Goodison and hasn’t signed the contract extension he needed too. Where do we think the England international will be when August arrives?

What is this poll asking?
Where will Barkley be in August?

How you can vote
At Everton
At Everton… until the end of the summer window
Somewhere else
I don’t really care anymore

Join The Vital Debate


2 Replies to “Sigurdsson? Yes Please, But NOT At £50m”

  • Barkley with a year to go on his contract, very hot and cold player, little international experience, no major successes (unless you count a kiddies cup), PL goal involvement every 254 minutes of play and you want £50 million.
    Siggurdson four years on his contract, consistent, major international experience (including farther along in the Euros than England where Barkley warmed the bench), goal involvement every 170 minutes & £50 million is too much?

  • I like the argument Dennis and wouldn’t go against it. Sigurdsson is more a £50m player than Barkley is. He would be IMHO even if Barkley didn’t only have 12 months on his contract but can you seriously say you think either would be worth £50m? No players is acutally worth that sort of money even in this era of football but if £50m is paid for either is again shows how detached football has become.

Comments are closed.